-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GH-36845: [C++][Python] Allow type promotion on pa.concat_tables
#36846
Conversation
|
pa.concat_tables
python/pyarrow/tests/test_table.py
Outdated
t2 = pa.Table.from_arrays( | ||
[pa.array([1.0, 2.0], type=pa.float32())], ["float_field"]) | ||
|
||
result = pa.concat_tables([t1, t2], promote=True) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
result = pa.concat_tables([t1, t2], promote=True) | |
with pytest.warns(FutureWarning): | |
result = pa.concat_tables([t1, t2], promote=True) |
This asserts the warning is raised and at the same time also ensures we don't unnecessarily see the warning in the pytest logs
After merging your PR, Conbench analyzed the 6 benchmarking runs that have been run so far on merge-commit 5f57219. There were 2 benchmark results indicating a performance regression:
The full Conbench report has more details. It also includes information about 8 possible false positives for unstable benchmarks that are known to sometimes produce them. |
FYI, those reported performance regressions were just flakes. The timings are still stable at the same level for later commits. |
…es` (apache#36846) Revival of apache#12000 ### Rationale for this change It would be great to be able to do promotions when `concat`'ing a table, such as: ```python def test_concat_tables_with_promotion_int(): import pyarrow as pa t1 = pa.Table.from_arrays( [pa.array([1, 2], type=pa.int64())], ["int"]) t2 = pa.Table.from_arrays( [pa.array([3, 4], type=pa.int32())], ["int"]) result = pa.concat_tables([t1, t2], promote=True) assert result.equals(pa.Table.from_arrays([ pa.array([1, 2, 3, 4], type=pa.int64()) ], ["int"])) ``` ### What changes are included in this PR? ### Are these changes tested? ### Are there any user-facing changes? * Closes: apache#36845 Lead-authored-by: Fokko Driesprong <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: David Li <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Joris Van den Bossche <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Joris Van den Bossche <[email protected]>
…es` (apache#36846) Revival of apache#12000 ### Rationale for this change It would be great to be able to do promotions when `concat`'ing a table, such as: ```python def test_concat_tables_with_promotion_int(): import pyarrow as pa t1 = pa.Table.from_arrays( [pa.array([1, 2], type=pa.int64())], ["int"]) t2 = pa.Table.from_arrays( [pa.array([3, 4], type=pa.int32())], ["int"]) result = pa.concat_tables([t1, t2], promote=True) assert result.equals(pa.Table.from_arrays([ pa.array([1, 2, 3, 4], type=pa.int64()) ], ["int"])) ``` ### What changes are included in this PR? ### Are these changes tested? ### Are there any user-facing changes? * Closes: apache#36845 Lead-authored-by: Fokko Driesprong <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: David Li <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Joris Van den Bossche <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Joris Van den Bossche <[email protected]>
…es` (apache#36846) Revival of apache#12000 ### Rationale for this change It would be great to be able to do promotions when `concat`'ing a table, such as: ```python def test_concat_tables_with_promotion_int(): import pyarrow as pa t1 = pa.Table.from_arrays( [pa.array([1, 2], type=pa.int64())], ["int"]) t2 = pa.Table.from_arrays( [pa.array([3, 4], type=pa.int32())], ["int"]) result = pa.concat_tables([t1, t2], promote=True) assert result.equals(pa.Table.from_arrays([ pa.array([1, 2, 3, 4], type=pa.int64()) ], ["int"])) ``` ### What changes are included in this PR? ### Are these changes tested? ### Are there any user-facing changes? * Closes: apache#36845 Lead-authored-by: Fokko Driesprong <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: David Li <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Joris Van den Bossche <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Joris Van den Bossche <[email protected]>
Revival of #12000
Rationale for this change
It would be great to be able to do promotions when
concat
'ing a table, such as:What changes are included in this PR?
Are these changes tested?
Are there any user-facing changes?